What are the other categories of persons in need of protection not Essay

What are the other categories of persons in need of protection not defined in the 1951 Refugee host and the 1967 Protocol - Essay ExampleIt dictates the available solution for refugees as exile. On the contrary, we are in a different era where refugees problems can be mighty handled and rule out exile. In this regard, dialogue can rule out or provide alternative amicable solutions to refugees.The Refugee Convention of 1951 and the 1967 Protocol covers widely the rights of the refugees in the entire world (Miller, 2014). However, the convention and its protocol fail to cover other groups of the vulnerable and the disadvantaged. These groups are the victims of female genital mutilation, child hunger, child recruitment into mislabeled militia, sex abuse victims, among others (Antoinette, 2010).The convection states that it does not provide permanent protection to refugees. This implies that when the refugee status of a person expires, he or she is venerable to other crimes such as se xual abuse and hunger. The 1951 refugee convention and 1967 protocol are to beThe convection however, has its fair share of limitations that emphasis more on the need to have the convection revised. For instance, the convection denies the refugees and camp refugees equating (Miller, 2014). More preference is given to those present instead of preference being based on the neediest. Furthermore, the convection also does not take into account factors accruing to the refugees as a result of policy-making, financial or social factors. The convection based asylum deemed to be most efficient during the Cold War (Miller, 2014). Applying the same convection today has proved vapid in seeking to solve some of the challenges faced by the asylum seekers. The convection fails to factor in mass asylum seekers outflows as well as their migrant movement patterns.The 1951 convection is very clear on the persons it protects. The convection clear defines refugees as a person who has freed his or her country due to risk of facing prosecution because of race, political opinion or religion. The 1967